kint next to the alternatives.

Manual planning, an in-house team, heuristics, general AI and spreadsheet solvers all have real strengths. This page shows where each one fits, without invented benchmarks.

How we compare

The approaches on this page solve real problems for real teams. We say where it fits better than kint, and where kint fits better.

both sides

Each comparison lists the dimensions where the alternative is the better choice.

no invented figures

No benchmark numbers or savings claims. Only properties you can check yourself.

used together

Most alternatives work alongside kint. Each page says how.

Comparisons

five common alternatives.

Each row names where the alternative is strongest. The full comparison goes through every dimension.

Before you choose

three questions decide it.

  1. does the plan have to be defended?To a board, a regulator, an auditor or the public. Then you need a stated gap and a record.
  2. do several rules interact?Labour rules, capacities, budgets and service duties at once. Then experience alone cannot show the best plan.
  3. does the decision repeat?Every shift, every day, every season. Then a model pays back each time it runs.
How to read the tables

three marks, no colours to decode.

  • kint fits better. The property matters for decisions you have to defend.
  • The alternative fits better. Often setup, familiarity, control or raw speed.
  • Both do equally well. Choose on the other dimensions.

put today's plan next to kint's.

Bring a plan your team already made. kint builds the model with the planners and sets both plans next to each other, with the binding limit of each.